Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report.

A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla involvement. Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy (PPD) with gastrojejunostomy was performed (250 min operative time) with 50 mL of intraoperative blood loss. She required intensive care for 3 days and was discharged on postoperative day 21 with no severe complications. Emergency treatment for a major duodenal injury or perforation remains challenging because of high morbidity and mortality. An appropriate treatment should be considered according to the nature of the defect. Although PPD is an acceptable procedure for patients with a duodenal neoplasm, its use in emergency surgery is rarely reported. PPD is more reliable than primary repair or anastomosis using a jejunal wall, and less invasive than pancreaticoduodenectomy, for emergency treatment. We performed PPD in this patient because the duodenal perforation was too large to reconstruct and did not involve the ampulla. PPD can be a safe and feasible alternative surgical procedure to pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation, especially in patients with a duodenal perforation that does not involve the ampulla.

Imaging spectrum of non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions of the duodenum: a pictorial review.

Given its crucial location at the crossroads of the gastrointestinal tract, the hepatobiliary system and the splanchnic vessels, the duodenum can be affected by a wide spectrum of abnormalities. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, in conjunction with endoscopy, are often performed to evaluate these conditions, and several duodenal pathologies can be identified on fluoroscopic studies. Since many conditions affecting this organ are asymptomatic, the role of imaging cannot be overemphasized. In this article we will review the imaging features of many conditions affecting the duodenum, focusing on cross-sectional imaging studies, including congenital malformations, such as annular pancreas and intestinal malrotation; vascular pathologies, such as superior mesenteric artery syndrome; inflammatory and infectious conditions; trauma; neoplasms and iatrogenic complications. Because of the complexity of the duodenum, familiarity with the duodenal anatomy and physiology as well as the imaging features of the plethora of conditions affecting this organ is crucial to differentiate those conditions that could be managed medically from the ones that require intervention.

Review of Traumatic Duodenal Injuries: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Traumatic duodenal injuries are rare and often challenging to diagnose and treat. Management of these injuries remains controversial and continues to evolve. Here, we performed a review of the literature and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of traumatic duodenal injuries.A common recommendation in more recent literature is primary, tension-free repair of duodenal injuries when possible if surgical repair is necessary. Conversely, if duodenal injuries are unamenable to primary repair, more complex procedures such as Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy may be necessary. Regardless of injury grade or type of surgical repair, the literature continues to support wide extraluminal drainage. Over time, the management of complex duodenal injuries has evolved to favor simple primary repair whenever possible. According to recent studies, more complex procedures are associated with higher rates of post-operative complications and should be reserved for severe injuries when primary repair is not possible.

Contemporary Management of Traumatic Duodenal Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic duodenal injury is a rare, potentially devastating condition with challenging management decisions. Contemporary literature on operative management of duodenal injury is lacking. The purpose of this study is to assess optimal management strategies based on outcomes of patients with traumatic duodenal injury at a single trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with traumatic duodenal injury from 2013-2020 at a level 1 trauma center was performed. Patient demographics, grade of injury as noted on CT scan or intraoperatively, surgical procedure(s) performed, and resultant outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: After excluding one patient due to death on arrival, 23 patients met inclusion criteria. Injuries consisted of grade 1 (n = 7), grade 2 (n = 2), grade 3 (n = 12), and grade 5 (n = 2); there were no grade 4 injuries. Patients were predominantly male (83%) with a median age of 30 years old. Nineteen patients (82%) underwent surgery. Four of nine patients (44%) with grade 1/2 injuries had hematomas and were managed non-operatively. The remaining five patients (56%) with grade 1/2 injuries underwent operation, which included primary repair (n = 3), duodenal exclusion (n = 1), and periduodenal drainage (n = 1). Of 12 patients with grade 3 injury, 6 underwent primary repair and 6 underwent resection. Three patients who underwent primary repair and one who underwent resection developed a duodenal leak. All patients with grade 5 injury (n = 2) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. CONCLUSION: Grade 1 and 2 duodenal hematomas can be managed non-operatively, while lacerations require operative repair. Outcomes may be better following resection in patients with grade 3 injury.

Surgical Repair of Iatrogenic Duodenal Injuries with a Roux-en-Y Duodenojejunostomy: A Physiology-oriented Approach.

Introduction: Iatrogenic duodenal injuries represent a condition associated with high morbidity and even mortality. Management is still controversial with a lack of consensus among experts regarding the optimal treatment. The purpose of the present study was to test and assess the results of a certain reconstruction technique. Material and Methods: Four patients (2 males and 2 females) of a mean age of 83 years with iatrogenic duodenal injuries underwent surgical repair of the duodenal perforation, with a two-layer duodenojejunostomy and a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. Results: Three out of four patients (75%) had a rapid and uncomplicated recovery (13 days mean postoperative length of hospital stay), while the fourth patient died in the ICU due to ARDS three weeks later, without however evidence of anastomotic leak. Conclusion: A variety of surgical repair techniques have been proposed to date; however, with controversial results. A repair using an isolated jejunal Roux-en-Y loop seems to fulfill all the optimal prerequisites for a successful anastomotic outcome and proved efficient in its certain form for the given patient sample.

Time from Injury to Initial Operation May Be the Sole Risk Factor for Postoperative Leakage in AAST-OIS 2 and 3 Traumatic Duodenal Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: Traumatic duodenal injury is a rare disease with limited evidence. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for postoperative leakage and outcomes of pyloric exclusion after duodenal grade 2 and 3 injury. Materials and Methods: We reviewed a prospectively collected trauma database for the period January 2004-December 2020. Patients with grade 2 and 3 traumatic duodenal injury were included. To identify the risk factors for postoperative leakage, we used a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic model. We constructed a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to predict risk factors for postoperative leakage. Results: During the 17-year period, 179,887 trauma patients were admitted to a regional trauma center in Korea. Of these patients, 74 (0.04%) had duodenal injuries. A total of 49 consecutive patients had grade 2 and 3 traumatic duodenal injuries and underwent laparotomy. The incidence of postoperative leakage was 32.6% (16/49). Overall mortality was 18.4% (9/49). A stepwise multivariable logistic regression and LASSO logistic regression model showed that time from injury to initial operation was the sole statistically significant risk factor. The ROC curve at the optimal threshold of 15.77 h showed the following: area under ROC curve, 0.782; sensitivity, 68.8%; specificity, 87.9%; positive predictive value, 73.3%; and negative predictive value, 85.3%. There was no significant difference in outcomes between primary repair alone and pyloric exclusion. Conclusions: Time from injury to initial operation may be the sole significant risk factor for postoperative duodenal leakage. Pyloric exclusion may not be able to prevent postoperative leakage.

An Extraordinary Case of Isolated Duodenal Injury after Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

Duodenal injuries are rare due to their preserved retroperitoneal location. They are mostly observed after deep penetration or high-impact blunt trauma. They are difficult to diagnose and treat. Our purpose was to report a case of duodenal injury after blunt trauma with the review of the literature. A 20-year male patient was brought to Emergency Department with abdominal pain after an accident, in which he was stuck between a reversing truck and a pole. Rigidity in all abdominal quadrants was detected. Free pelvic fluid was observed in computed tomography (CT). There was a grade II laceration at the fourth part of the duodenum. The laceration was primarily sutured, and a naso-jejunal tube was placed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day-8 with uneventful recovery. In suspicion of duodenal trauma, a meticulous anamnesis, careful physical examination, proper imaging technique at appropriate timing, and surgical exploration are important to reduce morbidity and mortality. Imaging findings of retroperitoneal organ injuries can be non-specific. We suggest that surgical exploration should be the first choice of treatment in cases with acute abdomen findings. Key Words: Blunt trauma, Acute abdomen, Duodenum, Retroperitoneum.

Hematoma duodenal en el adulto: aspectos clínicos imagenológicos. Presentación de tres casos / Duodenal hematoma in the adult: clinical imaging aspects. Presentation of three cases

Fundamento: el hematoma duodenal es una entidad poco frecuente y para su diagnóstico es preciso considerar la existencia de factores de riesgo, las manifestaciones clínicas y el modo de diagnóstico, entre estos, el imagenológico. Objetivo: mostrar distintas formas clínicas e imagenológicas de presentación del hematoma duodenal según tipo de estudio y tiempo de evolución. Presentación de casos: se presentaron tres casos de hematoma duodenal diagnosticados en diferentes periodos evolutivos. El antecedente traumático no fue recogido al inicio en dos de ellos pero las investigaciones imagenológicas orientaron su diagnóstico. El vómito y el dolor abdominal estuvieron presentes en los tres, la anemia, el tinte sub-ictérico y la toma del estado general en el caso de diagnóstico tardío de tres meses de evolución. El cuadro oclusivo intestinal alto surge secundario a una endoscopia con escleroterapia por úlcera sangrante en el tercer caso de forma aguda. En la ecografía, la radiografía contrastada del tubo digestivo y la tomografía axial computarizada se apreciaron variaciones del patrón en dependencia al tiempo de evolución. La ecografía como primer estudio detectó la colección en todos ellos y fue útil en el seguimiento, el estudio radiológico contrastado orientó el diagnóstico con predominio de patrón anfractuoso en el caso tardío, y la tomografía ofreció la mayor información. Conclusiones: para el diagnóstico del hematoma duodenal es necesario tenerlo presente e indagar sobre factores de riesgo, acudir a los medios diagnósticos disponibles y considerar que sus manifestaciones pueden variar según el tiempo de evolución. Se considera la tomografía como examen de elección (AU)

Background: the duodenal hematoma is an infrequent entity, usually of late diagnosis, which should be made according to risk factors, the clinical manifestations and imaging studies. Objective: to show different clinical and imaging forms of presentation of duodenal hematoma according to type of imaging study and time of progress.Cases reports: three cases of duodenal hematoma diagnosed in different follow up periods are presented. The history of the trauma was not recorded at the beginning in two cases neither considered as a predisposing factor, but the diagnostic research suspected the diagnosis. Vomiting and abdominal pain was seen in all three cases. Anemia, sub-jaundice dye and malaise were present at three months of follow up. Upper acute intestinal occlusive condition was secondary to endoscopic sclera-therapy due to digestive bleeding in the third case. Ultrasound, contrast radiography of the digestive tube and computerized axial tomography showed variations of the pattern depending on the modifications of the hematoma over time. Ultrasound as the first study detected the collection in all cases and was useful in the follow-up. Contrast radiological study was oriented towards the diagnosis and show predominance of regular patterns in case of late diagnosis. The Tomography achieved a greater diagnostic definition. Conclusions: for the diagnosis of duodenal hematoma, it is necessary to take into account and think about risk factors, and the proper management of imaging studies in relation to time of progress. Tomography is the examination of choice (AU)

Perforación duodenal por barotrauma durante colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica: caso clínico / Duodenal perforation due to barotrauma during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: clinical case

Resumen Introducción: La perforación duodenal secundaria a la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) es una complicación infrecuente y más aún cuando su mecanismo lesional es por barotrauma. La inyección de aire a alta presión produce un neumoretroperitoneo, cuya extensión y evolución lesional es incierta. Caso Clínico: Se comunica el caso de un hombre joven que sufrió una perforación duodenal durante una CPRE, su manejo quirúrgico y evolución. Discusión: El diagnóstico clínico-imagenológico suele ser precoz y claro si se detecta la lesión durante el procedimiento. El manejo terapéutico conservador o quirúrgico de esta entidad depende de varios factores que se analizan en el presente estudio.

Introduction: Duodenal perforation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a rare complication and even more if the mechanism of injury is secondary to barotrauma. The injection of high-pressure-air produces a pneumo-retroperitoneum, the extent and lesional evolution of which is uncertain. Clinical Case: We report the case of a young man who suffered a duodenal perforation during an ERCP, his surgical management and evolution. Discussion: The clinical-imaging diagnosis is usually early and clear if the lesion is detected during the procedure. Its conservative or surgical management will depends on several factors that are analyzed in the present study.

Management of Duodeno-Jejunal Flexure Transection after Blunt Trauma - A Modified Approach.

Background: Small bowel injuries are infrequent after blunt trauma and typically affect fixed segment. Untimely management of such injuries, results in high-output entero-cutaneous fistula which increases morbidity and mortality. Treatment of duodeno-jejunal flexure transection has been traditionally done by pyloric exclusion with gastrojejunostomy, but more recent evidence suggests that end-to-end anastomosis or primary closure may be equally effective in which duodeno-jejunal anastomosis is protected via an external tube duodenostomy. Objective: The objective of the study is to provide a modification to the technique of management of duodeno-jejunal flexure injury, avoiding external tube duodenostomy. Material and Methods: Patients admitted from July 1, 2015 to June 1, 2018 were identified and examined for duodeno-jejunal flexure transection. Non-accidental injury cases were excluded. Results: In the study period, a total of 10 patients were admitted with duodeno-jejunal flexure transection. All cases were admitted 24 hours after the injury and presented with shock. After fluid resuscitation and investigations, they were taken for urgent laparotomy. The whole of duodenum was mobilised, the transected ends were debrided and end-to-end duodenojejunal anastomosis was performed in two-layer fashion. An 18-French Nasojejunal (NJ) tube was placed beyond the anastomosis, and an 18-French nasogastric (NG) tube was placed in the stomach for gastric decompression. A feeding jejunostomy was performed in all cases. Both NG and NJ tubes were removed after bowel movements started and FJ was removed on first follow up. There was no incidence of duodenum related complications, and all were doing well on follow up. Discussion and conclusion: Placing the nasojejunal and nasogastric tube eliminates the need for duodenostomy and gastrostomy, respectively. This method protects the duodeno-jejunal anastomosis and decreases the incidence of duodenum-related complications.

Damage control in penetrating duodenal trauma: less is better - the sequel.

The overall incidence of duodenal injuries in severely injured trauma patients is between 0.2 to 0.6% and the overall prevalence in those suffering from abdominal trauma is 3 to 5%. Approximately 80% of these cases are secondary to penetrating trauma, commonly associated with vascular and adjacent organ injuries. Therefore, defining the best surgical treatment algorithm remains controversial. Mild to moderate duodenal trauma is currently managed via primary repair and simple surgical techniques. However, severe injuries have required complex surgical techniques without significant favorable outcomes and a consequential increase in mortality rates. This article aims to delineate the experience in the surgical management of penetrating duodenal injuries via the creation of a practical and effective algorithm that includes basic principles of damage control surgery that sticks to the philosophy of "Less is Better". Surgical management of all penetrating duodenal trauma should always default when possible to primary repair. When confronted with a complex duodenal injury, hemodynamic instability, and/or significant associated injuries, the default should be damage control surgery. Definitive reconstructive surgery should be postponed until the patient has been adequately resuscitated and the diamond of death has been corrected.

El trauma de duodeno comúnmente se produce por un trauma penetrante que puede asociarse a lesiones vasculares y de órganos adyacentes. En el manejo quirúrgico se recomienda realizar un reparo primario o el empleo de técnicas quirúrgicas simples. Sin embargo, el abordaje de lesiones severas del duodeno es un tema controversial. Anteriormente, se han descrito técnicas como la exclusión pilórica o la pancreatoduodenectomía con resultados no concluyentes. El presente artículo presenta una propuesta del manejo de control de daños del trauma penetrante de duodeno, a través, de un algoritmo de cinco pasos. Este algoritmo plantea una solución para el cirujano cuando no es posible realizar el reparo primario. El control de daños del duodeno y su reconstrucción depende de una toma de decisiones respecto a la porción del duodeno lesionada y el compromiso sobre el complejo pancreatoduodenal. Se recomiendan medidas rápidas para contener el daño y se proponen vías de reconstrucción duodenal diferente a las clásicamente descritas. Igualmente, la probabilidad de complicaciones como fistula duodenales es considerable, por lo que proponemos, que el manejo de este tipo de fistulas de alto gasto se aborde por medio de una laparostomía retroperitoneal (lumbotomía). El abordaje del trauma penetrante de duodeno se puede realizar a través del principio "menos es mejor".

Pediatric blunt abdominal trauma with horizontal duodenal injury in school baseball: A case report.

RATIONALE: Pediatric sports injuries, including those from baseball, most often are musculoskeletal injuries and rarely include blunt abdominal injuries. Duodenal injury is rare and often associated with other organ injuries. Because it has a relatively high mortality, early recognition and timely treatment are needed. Here, we report a case of successful treatment of a pediatric patient with duodenal injury incurred in the context of school baseball. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 13-year-old boy suffered blunt abdominal trauma and a right-hand injury caused by beating his abdomen strongly with his own right knuckle after he performed a diving catch during a baseball game. On the following day, the abdominal pain had worsened. DIAGNOSES: Computed tomography led to a suspicion of injury to the horizontal part of the duodenum. INTERVENTIONS: The duodenal injuries were repaired by simple closure. On the 10th post-operative day, an abscess formed in the retroperitoneal cavity because of an occult pancreatic injury. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage of the cavity was performed. OUTCOMES: The post-operative course of the abscess drainage was uneventful. The patient was discharged from our hospital on day 72 after admission and was in good health at the 9-month follow-up. LESSONS: Regardless of the type of injury, we must assess the life-threatening conditions that can be expected based on the mechanism of the injury. In duodenal injuries, it is critical to perform surgical procedures and post-operative management based on the assumption of injuries to other organs.

The Importance of Autopsy in a Case of Digestive Perforation Undetected by Postmortem Computed Tomography.

ABSTRACT: Cases of foreign body ingestion in the forensic literature are mainly described in children or psychiatric patients. Postmortem imaging can detect most foreign bodies, but its sensitivity depends, among other things, on the type of item and its location. In some cases, the ingestion of foreign bodies can remain unnoticed and have serious consequences for the patient. We describe the case of a patient who died in a psychiatric seclusion room with no obvious cause and for whom a forensic autopsy was requested. Further investigations showed the existence of a subdural hematoma associated with a midline shift, secondary to a skull fracture that was considered to be the cause of death. Toxicological analyses identified in blood several drugs, including diazepam (24 ng/mL) and its major metabolite nordazepam (24 ng/mL), propranolol (57 ng/mL), paliperidone (9 ng/mL), and loxapine (620 ng/mL). The forensic autopsy revealed the existence of a gastrointestinal perforation after the ingestion of a plastic teaspoon, which the postmortem CT scan had failed to detect. Although technological advances continue to assist the forensic pathologist in his diagnosis, autopsy still has a leading role in forensic investigations and does not yet seem to be replaceable by imaging techniques alone.

Traumatic duodenal injuries in children: a single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic duodenal injuries in children are rare, and few studies have documented duodenal injuries in children, especially in Australasia. This study assessed the mechanism, investigations, management and outcomes of children (aged <16 years) with duodenal injuries. METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted over a 16-year period from a single paediatric trauma centre. RESULTS: Sixteen cases of duodenal injuries were identified: 15 cases of blunt duodenal injury and only one case of penetrating injury. Motor vehicular accidents were the most common cause of injury, followed by auto-pedestrian injuries and handlebar injuries. Only grade I and II injuries were identified. Computed tomography aided diagnosis in all cases of blunt duodenal injuries, especially given the variable nature of symptoms. Eight patients underwent laparotomy, of whom five required duodenal repair. Three patients underwent primary repair with omental patch, one patient underwent primary repair with gastrostomy and one patient underwent two-layered repair with t-tube duodenostomy. There were no delays in operative management within 24 h and no complications identified. CONCLUSION: In comparison to other paediatric trauma centres worldwide, the majority of duodenal injuries were low grade and attributed to blunt trauma. Computed tomography aided diagnosis in all cases of blunt duodenal injury. Primary repair of duodenal injuries was possible in the majority of cases requiring operative repair.

Duodenal Laceration Due to Blunt Trauma Caused by Horse Kick: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Duodenal trauma usually consists of retroperitoneal lesions. Its management can be complicated by the location of the injury and difficulty in making an early diagnosis. Duodenal injuries are divided into blunt and penetrating trauma, and the possible results are hematoma, laceration, and devascularization. Duodenal lesions due to blunt trauma are usually accompanied by lesions of nearby organs. We present a rare case of a single duodenal laceration due to blunt abdominal trauma caused by a horse kick, along with a literature review. CASE REPORT A 13-year-old boy presented to our emergency department after being kicked by a horse in his abdomen. He was stable and complained of abdominal pain without any other specifications. Computed tomography imaging revealed a retropneumoperitoneum and free fluid in the abdominal cavity. The patient was taken for an emergency laparotomy, which showed a single duodenal laceration of the second and third portions of the duodenum. The laceration was repaired with a double-layer closure using monofilament 3-0 polypropylene suture. The patient recovered from his injuries and was well at his last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the possible outcomes of an innocent blunt trauma and the importance of early diagnosis for the best outcome of a duodenal laceration. It also identifies the dissociation between the patient's clinical presentation and his significant intra-abdominal injury.

Surgical Management of Penetrating Duodenal Injury: Role of Primary Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of primary repair in penetrating duodenal injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey, between March 2011 and September 2018 Methodology: Patients with penetrating duodenal injury, who underwent primary repai, were reviewed retrospectively. The patients who had early death, grade 1 duodenum injuries and operative procedures except primary repair, were excluded from the study. Age, gender, mechanism of penetrating injury, grade of the duodenal injury, associated intra-abdominal injuries, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, duodenum-related mortality and morbidity were analysed. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the outcomes between survivor and non-survivor groups. RESULTS: Data of 26 patients with primary repair (5 females, 21 males) were reviewed. The mean age was 33.11 ±12.07 years; and gunshot (n=19, 73.1%) was the most common cause of the duodenal injury. Twenty-five had a total of 103 (3.9 injuries per patient) associated intra-abdominal organ injuries. 20 (76.9%) patients had grade 2 duodenal injuries; and the most injured portion of the duodenum was segment IV (n: 9, 34.6%). Three (11.5%) patients had duodenal leakage and postoperative complication rate was 53.8%. Duodenum-related mortality (DRM) was 3.8% (n:1) and overall mortality was 19.2% (n:5). The anatomic localisation of duodenal injury and associated vascular trauma were significantly different between survivor and non-survivor groups (p: 0.038, and p: 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSION: Associated intra-abdominal organ and vascular injuries were predictive factors of overall mortality in duodenal injuries. Duodenum-related mortality was low, for this reason minimally invasive procedures such as primary repair will be more accurate in surgical management of penetrating duodenal injuries. Key Words: Duodenal injury, Primary repair, Surgical management.

Pancreaticoduodenal arterial hemorrhage following blunt abdominal trauma treated with transcatheter arterial embolization: Two case reports.

RATIONALE: Although surgery has been the standard treatment for pancreaticoduodenal trauma because of the complex anatomical relation of the affect organs, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has recently been introduced as a safe and effective treatment. However, TAE for pancreaticoduodenal arterial hemorrhage (PDAH) can be challenging because it is difficult to localize the involved artery and to embolize the bleeding completely due to the abundant collateral channels of the pancreaticoduodenal artery (PDA). PATIENT CONCERNS: Herein, we report 2 cases of PDAH that occurred after falling down in case 1 and a pedestrian traffic accident in case 2. DIAGNOSES: Multidetector computed tomography scan revealed massive retroperitoneal hematoma with active extravasation of contrast media from the PDA without any duodenal perforation or advanced pancreatic injury in both patients. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were successfully treated using only TAE with a combination of microcoils and n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) in case 1, and only NBCA in case 2. OUTCOMES: There was no complication such as duodenal ischemia or pancreatitis. Laparotomy was not needed after TAE. LESSONS: In selective PDAH cases, TAE may be a reasonable alternative to emergency laparotomy. It is expected that a careful and repetitive approach, based on complete angiography and embolization with a permanent liquid embolic agent such as NBCA could increase the success rate of TAE.